blog
Usually no. A work email can expose your job search, create access problems, and make reference-check communication harder to control. A stable personal or dedicated job-search inbox is usually the better choice.
Usually yes: a separate, stable email address is often the best way to handle reference checks without mixing sensitive hiring messages into your main inbox or risking missed follow-up in a temporary one.
A separate browser profile is usually a smart way to handle background checks more privately, with fewer login mix-ups, cleaner downloads, and better control over sensitive follow-up.
Public Wi‑Fi is usually a bad place to complete background checks because the process often includes identity-rich forms, document uploads, and time-sensitive verification links. Use a private connection you control whenever possible.
Usually no. A work browser profile can expose background-check portals, saved logins, autofill, and screening follow-up inside an employer-managed environment. A personal browser profile is usually safer.
Usually no. Even on a personal phone or laptop, background checks on employer Wi‑Fi can leave network traces, portal metadata, and timing patterns you do not control. A personal connection is usually safer.
Usually no. Employer-managed laptops can expose background-check activity, downloaded forms, and identity-related follow-up through logs, monitoring, and synced files. A personal device is usually safer.
Usually no. A true burner phone number is often too fragile for salary negotiations, but a stable secondary number can protect your privacy without risking missed offer calls or deadlines.
Usually only if it is a stable number you control, check regularly, and expect to keep active through the full screening process.
Usually no. A college email can work for background checks only if you still control it, check it often, and expect to keep it active through the full screening process.